Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
yusufipek 7b60f3bf76 feat(uploads): size one upload against the account's own quota
The per-file ceiling was a flat 5 GiB from the environment, which is both
too small for a paying account with 200 GB of storage and unaware of what
an upload actually costs. The provider derives its own renditions from the
file (1080p, 720p and down) and bills them to the same account, so a file
allowed to fill the quota exactly is over it by the time it finishes
processing.

The ceiling is now 80% of whatever limit the account is held to: 160 GB on
the plan, 2.4 GB on a cardless trial, and it moves on its own when either
number changes. OPENFRAME_MAX_VIDEO_UPLOAD_BYTES keeps working as an
absolute cap for a host that wants one, where the lower of the two applies,
and an instance running without billing has no quota to divide and falls
back to the flat 5 GiB. The refusal now names the ceiling, which the old
one left the client to guess.

Finalize re-checks only the host cap. Re-deriving the account's ceiling
there would delete a finished upload over a plan that lapsed while the
bytes were in flight, and an upload larger than what was declared is
already caught by the declared-size check beside it.
2026-08-20 08:52:26 +03:00
yusufipek 63288761ed fix(storage): count a finished Bunny upload the moment it lands
Two reasons the number on the storage page could read as nothing.

The per-user Bunny figure was computed inside a two minute cache. The declared
size lands on the row in the same transaction that deletes the reservation, so
for up to two minutes an upload that had just succeeded counted as nothing:
usage fell back towards zero and the next upload was measured against a total
that ignored the one before it. The call to Bunny stays cached, because it is
the slow half and its answer is the same for everybody. The join against our own
rows is now read fresh, per user, on every check.

A failed call to Bunny returned an empty map before it had looked at a single
row, so an account with gigabytes of declared uploads read as empty whenever
Bunny was unreachable. Bunny's figure being gone is not a reason to forget the
sizes we wrote down ourselves.

The rule for which of the two numbers to charge is unchanged, and the comment
above it now says why rather than guessing. What Bunny reports mid-encode is
partial: storageSize counts what has been written so far and climbs as each
rendition lands. A six minute cut uploaded at 2.5 GB read as 475 MB halfway
through and settled above 3 GB once it finished, because Bunny keeps the
original alongside every rendition. Taking the larger of the declared size and
Bunny's is right at every point on that curve; taking Bunny's whenever it is
non-zero would hand most of the quota back in the middle of an encode.

The settings card also claimed a 200 GB limit while showing a 3 GB one, and told
a trial account to delete files or contact support.
2026-08-18 11:42:30 +03:00
yusufipek 00f1d430b8 fix(uploads): stop a storage hold from being dropped by whoever can name it
A reservation id was never a secret and could not have been one. An upload
token is base64url(payload) followed by its signature, so a client can read
every claim out of its own token, and the two R2 init routes hand their
reservation ids to the client outright. The asset route takes a reservation
id from the request body and deleted it on the strength of that id and the
billed user alone, and every hold an account owns is billed to the same user.

So a caller could start a Bunny upload, read the id out of the token they
were just given, quote it while attaching a one byte image or even a bare
YouTube link, and have the quota handed back while the upload carried on.
Repeat and a trial worth three gigabytes uploads as much as it likes for as
long as Bunny takes to report a figure of its own. Signing the id rather than
handing it over bought nothing, because signing is not hiding.

A hold now records what it was opened for and is only ever consumed by that
flow, so naming one is no longer enough to drop it.

Guests hold against the workspace owner's quota rather than their own and had
no way to give it back: the release was gated on being signed in. Declaring a
size and walking away cost the guest nothing and cost the owner their whole
remaining allowance for two hours. The guest grant now carries the reservation
and the declared size, bound to the Bunny video as well as to ours, so
cancelling gives the quota back and costs them the upload it stood for. What a
guest can hold without cancelling lapses in half an hour rather than two hours.

The in-transaction fallback check counted the account's Bunny storage as zero
on a Bunny upload, because the figure was only prefetched for R2 providers and
that branch was unreachable for Bunny until this PR made it reachable. On an
account whose storage is all Bunny that was a check that could not fail. It is
prefetched for every provider that can reach the fallback now.
2026-08-18 11:07:18 +03:00
yusufipk 39e81042bb feat(billing): let people try the product before handing over a card
The trial now starts inside the product, at email verification, and Stripe
grants none at all: checkout creates a subscription that bills immediately.
Verifying an address is what buys the seven days, which is also the cheapest
abuse control there is.

An unexpired trial is treated as an entitlement the account already holds, so a
Stripe sync can add access but never retracts a trial that has not run out. That
matters most for the abandoned checkout: the resulting incomplete subscription
carries no trial_end, and writing it through would have erased the days the
account still had and locked it out.

Unpaid accounts are bounded by what they can cost us rather than by what they
can do: one workspace, one project, 3 GiB of direct uploads. YouTube imports,
share links, guests, comments and approvals stay unlimited, because those are
the parts worth trying and they cost nothing. isPaidTier() is the new seam;
hasBillingAccess() answers a different question now that access no longer
implies a card.

Signup CTAs, the pricing card, the comparison pages, the terms and the refund
policy all said the trial converts to a paid plan by itself. It no longer does,
so they say what happens instead. Settings and a banner name both dates that
matter: when the trial ends, and the fifteen days after that during which
nothing is deleted.

/admin/growth compares the two funnels on signup to paid within a fixed 30 day
window, not trial to paid. Dropping the card requirement multiplies trials, so
the old ratio can fall while more people actually pay, and reading it that way
would retire the change for the wrong reason.
2026-08-05 19:40:36 +03:00
yusufipk 1d099c68f2 test: add unit, API, component and end-to-end test suites
The repo had no automated tests. Every change was verified by hand.

Adds four layers, 2023 tests in total, runnable with one command:

- 1191 unit tests over the pure logic in lib/, including the full
  computeProjectAccess permission matrix and the billing gate
- 167 component and hook tests in jsdom, covering the hooks that hold
  real logic rather than presentational wrappers
- 647 API integration tests against a real Postgres, with only auth()
  mocked, including a data-driven sweep asserting that none of the 60
  route modules answers 2xx to an unauthenticated caller
- 18 Playwright specs driving a real browser against a real build

Infrastructure: vitest.config.ts with three projects, a disposable
Postgres and MinIO in docker-compose.test.yml, factories and helpers
under tests/, scripts/test.sh as the single entry point, a pre-push
hook running bun run verify, and CI split into check, test and e2e jobs.

The test database is built with prisma db push plus a replay of the
hand-written SQL, because prisma migrate deploy cannot build this schema
from empty: the migration history has no captured baseline. This mirrors
what scripts/docker-db-bootstrap.ts already does in production, and
tests/setup/db-global.ts carries a drift guard so a new migration fails
the run until someone reviews it.

Production code is unchanged apart from one pure-function extraction out
of use-video-player.ts, which was too large to test in jsdom.

Several tests pin behaviour that looks wrong, each marked KNOWN BUG in
place. TESTING.md section 12 records where the plan turned out to be
wrong, and AGENTS.md now states which layer a change needs a test in.
2026-07-26 11:17:26 +07:00