mirror of
https://github.com/yusufipk/OpenFrame.git
synced 2026-09-11 09:36:08 +00:00
yusufipek
4c0b18e5e4
Three places still carried the old promise. The register form, which is where the CTA lands and where the trial is granted, said nothing about it at all, so the landing page's claim had to be taken on faith across a page load. The comparison profile summary still described the trial without mentioning the card. And the CtaLink comment quoted a button label that no longer exists. The hero and closing CTAs now read 'Open dashboard' for a signed-in visitor. That button already pointed at /dashboard for them, and offering a free trial to someone who is mid-subscription reads as a bug. The pricing card keeps the short label because it sits directly under 'No credit card' and the card narrows to about 230px at the md breakpoint, where the long label would wrap out of a fixed-height button.
572 lines
22 KiB
TypeScript
572 lines
22 KiB
TypeScript
import type { CompetitorProfile, CompetitorSource } from '@/lib/marketing/comparison-types';
|
||
|
||
const LAST_CHECKED = '2026-06-14';
|
||
|
||
export const competitorSources: CompetitorSource[] = [
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'frame-io',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://frame.io/pricing',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Free plan: 2 members, 2GB storage, 2 projects.',
|
||
'Pro: $15/member/month with 2TB included + 2TB per additional member.',
|
||
'Team: $25/member/month with 3TB included + 2TB per additional member.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Pricing excludes tax. Enterprise is custom.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'frame-io',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://help.frame.io/en/articles/9090642-getting-started-what-is-a-user',
|
||
sourceType: 'help',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Reviewers can access media via share links without a Frame.io account.',
|
||
'Reviewers are free and unlimited for external link-based review.',
|
||
'Paid member seats are required for internal project management roles.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Guest users inside the account are limited on some plans.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'frame-io',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://help.frame.io/en/articles/9105242-share-links-explained-for-clients',
|
||
sourceType: 'help',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Share links support passphrase protection, expiration, download controls, and approval status.',
|
||
'Commenting can be disabled per share link.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Some enterprise security features require higher tiers.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'wipster',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://wipster.io/pricing',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Light plan: $9.95/month annually or $11.95 monthly with 50GB storage.',
|
||
'Team plan: $19.95/user/month annually or $25 monthly starting at 250GB.',
|
||
'Unlimited reviewers on all plans.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Enterprise pricing is custom.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'wipster',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://wipster.io/product',
|
||
sourceType: 'product',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Supports video, image, PDF, and audio review.',
|
||
'Version comparison, approval tracking, and NLE panel integrations.',
|
||
'Public URL or private email sharing for reviewers.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['SSO and org controls are enterprise features.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'dropbox-replay',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://help.dropbox.com/create-upload/dropbox-replay-faq',
|
||
sourceType: 'faq',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Replay is available on all Dropbox plans but free tiers have 4–10 file limits.',
|
||
'Replay Add-On removes file creation/upload limits.',
|
||
'Files uploaded from outside Dropbox count against Dropbox storage.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Replay Add-On requires a paid Dropbox plan.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'dropbox-replay',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://www.dropbox.com/replay',
|
||
sourceType: 'product',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Replay Add-On is about €9/user/month annually or €11 monthly.',
|
||
'Integrates with Premiere Pro, After Effects, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Pro Tools.',
|
||
'Supports version comparison, transcriptions, due dates, and password-protected links on paid add-on.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Requires Dropbox ecosystem buy-in.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'krock',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://krock.io/pricing/',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Free: 1 user, 2GB, 2 projects, unlimited reviewers.',
|
||
'Pro: $10/user/month with 2TB storage and unlimited projects.',
|
||
'Unlimited plan: flat $400/month for large teams.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Storage add-ons are $10/month per TB.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'krock',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://krock.io/help-center/how-to-manage-team-members-collaborators-reviewers/',
|
||
sourceType: 'help',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Reviewers can access projects via links without paid seats.',
|
||
'Includes storyboard, animatic, and production workflow tooling.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Storyboard AI is newer and may not fit every pipeline.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'revcut',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://revcut.io/pricing',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Crew: €69/month with 8 seats and 3TB active storage.',
|
||
'Studio: €149/month with 15 seats and 5TB active storage.',
|
||
'14-day free trial with no credit card required.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Storage is designed for active review cycles, not long-term archiving.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'revcut',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://revcut.io/client-video-review',
|
||
sourceType: 'product',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Clients review via secure links with name-only access, no account required.',
|
||
'Native DaVinci Resolve plugin for marker export.',
|
||
'EU-hosted with GDPR-minded positioning.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Premiere/FCP integrations listed as coming later.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'vimeo-review',
|
||
sourceUrl:
|
||
'https://help.vimeo.com/hc/en-us/articles/12426192100113-How-to-use-and-manage-video-review-links',
|
||
sourceType: 'help',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Review links work for people without a Vimeo account.',
|
||
'Supports passwords, expiration, downloads, commenting, and approval status toggles.',
|
||
'Guests provide name and email before commenting.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Folder review links require Standard plan or higher.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'vimeo-review',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://vimeo.com/features/video-collaboration',
|
||
sourceType: 'product',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Review is built into Vimeo hosting with version history and Premiere integration.',
|
||
'Time-stamped comments with resolve workflow.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Best fit when you already host video on Vimeo.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'vitransfer',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://www.vitransfer.com/docs',
|
||
sourceType: 'docs',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'AGPL-3.0 self-hosted video review and approval platform.',
|
||
'Share links support password, email OTP, guest mode, and approval workflows.',
|
||
'Guests are view-only by default; downloads gated until approval.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Requires Docker infrastructure and ongoing maintenance.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'freeframe',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://github.com/Techiebutler/freeframe',
|
||
sourceType: 'github',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Self-hosted open-source media review for video, image, and audio.',
|
||
'Frame-accurate comments, annotations, approvals, version compare, and guest share links.',
|
||
'Uses FastAPI backend with Next.js frontend and S3-compatible storage.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Requires external S3, SMTP, and production ops setup.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'flask',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://flask.do/pricing',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Free: $0, no card required, all features, 1 asset at a time.',
|
||
'Pro: $15/user/month billed yearly; $0 per guest; unlimited uploads.',
|
||
'Pro includes original file downloads for 30 days; enterprise from 15 seats.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Pro is billed yearly; enterprise pricing is custom.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'flask',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://flask.do/',
|
||
sourceType: 'product',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Voice-first feedback: record spoken notes while watching and Flask structures timestamped comments.',
|
||
'Supports drawing, references, version compare, Drive import, and Premiere export.',
|
||
'Positions upmarket for production teams of 5–100 people.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Free tier limits you to one active asset at a time.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'aligno',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://aligno.io/pricing',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Pro: $18/month or $180/year flat rate per creator.',
|
||
'Clients never need accounts and do not count toward limits.',
|
||
'Supports images, PDFs, videos, and webpages with explicit approval states.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Video review is one part of a broader multi-asset approval tool.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
competitor: 'videoreview-pro',
|
||
sourceUrl: 'https://videoreview.pro/',
|
||
sourceType: 'pricing',
|
||
lastChecked: LAST_CHECKED,
|
||
claims: [
|
||
'Free forever with 30 minutes total video storage.',
|
||
'Pro: $99/year with 10 hours of storage.',
|
||
'All features included on both plans; only storage differs.',
|
||
],
|
||
caveats: ['Very limited storage compared to production workflows.'],
|
||
confidence: 'high',
|
||
},
|
||
];
|
||
|
||
export const competitorProfiles: Record<string, CompetitorProfile> = {
|
||
'frame-io': {
|
||
id: 'frame-io',
|
||
name: 'Frame.io',
|
||
tagline: 'Enterprise creative operations platform with deep Adobe integration.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Large post-production teams in Adobe Creative Cloud',
|
||
'Studios needing enterprise security, DRM, and MAM workflows',
|
||
'Teams that need Camera to Cloud and hardware integrations',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Industry-standard Adobe Premiere and Final Cut integrations',
|
||
'Mature share-link review with approvals, watermarks, and enterprise controls',
|
||
'Transcription, captions, metadata, and broad asset management',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Per-member pricing scales quickly for small teams',
|
||
'Heavier platform than freelancers need for simple client approvals',
|
||
'No self-hosting option for teams that need full data control',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free (2GB) · Pro $15/member/mo · Team $25/member/mo',
|
||
pricingNotes: [
|
||
'External reviewers via share links are free.',
|
||
'Paid seats are for team members managing projects inside Frame.io.',
|
||
],
|
||
reviewerAccess:
|
||
'Share links allow review without a Frame.io account; internal roles require paid seats.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: [
|
||
'https://frame.io/pricing',
|
||
'https://help.frame.io/en/articles/9090642-getting-started-what-is-a-user',
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
wipster: {
|
||
id: 'wipster',
|
||
name: 'Wipster',
|
||
tagline: 'Video-first review and approval for agencies and production teams.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Agencies managing multiple client review cycles',
|
||
'Video teams wanting NLE panel integrations',
|
||
'Teams that need unlimited external reviewers',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Unlimited reviewers on every plan',
|
||
'Side-by-side version comparison and approval tracking',
|
||
'Premiere Pro and After Effects panel integrations',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Per-user pricing on Team plans',
|
||
'US-hosted SaaS with no self-host option',
|
||
'Broader creative-ops features are lighter than Frame.io enterprise',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Light $9.95/mo · Team from $19.95/user/mo',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Free trial with no credit card required.', 'Enterprise is custom.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Reviewers can use public links or email invites without paid seats.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: ['https://wipster.io/pricing', 'https://wipster.io/product'],
|
||
},
|
||
'dropbox-replay': {
|
||
id: 'dropbox-replay',
|
||
name: 'Dropbox Replay',
|
||
tagline: 'Review and approval add-on inside the Dropbox ecosystem.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Teams already storing and delivering files in Dropbox',
|
||
'Editors who want NLE integrations tied to Dropbox storage',
|
||
'Lightweight review without adopting a separate platform',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Native integrations with Premiere, After Effects, FCP, Resolve, and Pro Tools',
|
||
'Version comparison, transcriptions, and due dates on paid add-on',
|
||
'Familiar Dropbox security and link management',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Requires Dropbox plan plus Replay Add-On for full usage',
|
||
'Free Replay tiers cap active files at 4–10 uploads',
|
||
'Not a standalone review platform with its own project model',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Replay Add-On ~€9/user/mo annually',
|
||
pricingNotes: [
|
||
'Basic Replay is included but file-limited on most plans.',
|
||
'Password protection and transcription require the paid add-on.',
|
||
],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Collaborators review in browser; full value assumes Dropbox account context.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: [
|
||
'https://www.dropbox.com/replay',
|
||
'https://help.dropbox.com/create-upload/dropbox-replay-faq',
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
krock: {
|
||
id: 'krock',
|
||
name: 'Krock.io',
|
||
tagline: 'Creative production workspace with storyboards, animatics, and review.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Animation studios and pre-to-post production pipelines',
|
||
'Teams wanting storyboard and animatic review in one tool',
|
||
'Studios needing unlimited external reviewers',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Storyboard and animatic tooling upstream of video review',
|
||
'Unlimited reviewers on all plans',
|
||
'Integrations with Adobe CC, Resolve, FCP, and Slack',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Per-user pricing on Pro plan',
|
||
'Broader production tooling may be more than solo freelancers need',
|
||
'No self-hosting option',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free · Pro $10/user/mo · Unlimited $400/mo flat',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['7-day trial on paid plans.', 'Storage add-ons available.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Guest review links without account creation.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: [
|
||
'https://krock.io/pricing/',
|
||
'https://krock.io/help-center/how-to-manage-team-members-collaborators-reviewers/',
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
revcut: {
|
||
id: 'revcut',
|
||
name: 'RevCut',
|
||
tagline: 'EU-hosted video review built for editors and small post teams.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'EU-based editors needing GDPR-minded hosting',
|
||
'DaVinci Resolve-first workflows',
|
||
'Small teams wanting client review without logins',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Clients review via secure links with name-only access',
|
||
'Native DaVinci Resolve plugin',
|
||
'Explicit EU hosting and privacy positioning',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'No self-hosting option',
|
||
'Higher entry pricing than solo freelancer tools',
|
||
'Premiere/FCP integrations still limited compared to Frame.io',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Crew €69/mo · Studio €149/mo',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['14-day free trial.', 'Storage is for active review cycles.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Clients use secure links with optional password; no account required.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: ['https://revcut.io/pricing', 'https://revcut.io/client-video-review'],
|
||
},
|
||
'vimeo-review': {
|
||
id: 'vimeo-review',
|
||
name: 'Vimeo Review',
|
||
tagline: 'Review tools built into Vimeo video hosting.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Teams already hosting and delivering on Vimeo',
|
||
'Creators who want review without a second subscription',
|
||
'Workflows centered on Vimeo distribution',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Review links with no Vimeo account required for guests',
|
||
'Version history, status labels, and Premiere integration',
|
||
'Password and expiration controls on review links',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Tied to Vimeo hosting plans',
|
||
'Less focused on standalone approval workflows',
|
||
'No self-hosting or open-source path',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Bundled with Vimeo Standard+ plans',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Folder review links require Standard plan or higher.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'External reviewers use review links without Vimeo accounts.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: [
|
||
'https://vimeo.com/features/video-collaboration',
|
||
'https://help.vimeo.com/hc/en-us/articles/12426192100113-How-to-use-and-manage-video-review-links',
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
vitransfer: {
|
||
id: 'vitransfer',
|
||
name: 'ViTransfer',
|
||
tagline: 'AGPL self-hosted video review with approval workflows.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Teams that want open-source and full infrastructure control',
|
||
'Studios with Docker ops capacity',
|
||
'Privacy-sensitive client work kept on owned hardware',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'No subscription fees beyond your own infrastructure',
|
||
'Per-video approvals with download gating',
|
||
'Password, email OTP, and guest access modes',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Requires setup, maintenance, and transcoding resources',
|
||
'Guest mode is view-only by default',
|
||
'Smaller ecosystem than commercial incumbents',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free (self-hosted, AGPL-3.0)',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Storage limited only by your own hardware.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Share links with configurable auth; guest mode is view-only.',
|
||
selfHosted: true,
|
||
sources: ['https://www.vitransfer.com/docs', 'https://www.vitransfer.com/about'],
|
||
},
|
||
freeframe: {
|
||
id: 'freeframe',
|
||
name: 'FreeFrame',
|
||
tagline: 'Self-hosted open-source media review platform.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Teams wanting multi-format review on owned infrastructure',
|
||
'Organizations with S3 and SMTP already in place',
|
||
'Open-source adopters comparing to Frame.io',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Video, image, and audio review in one platform',
|
||
'Approvals, version compare, guest share links, and SSE updates',
|
||
'Bring-your-own S3, Redis, and PostgreSQL',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Production deployment requires DevOps effort',
|
||
'Different stack (FastAPI + Next.js) from OpenFrame',
|
||
'Younger project with smaller community',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free (self-hosted, open source)',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Infrastructure and ops costs apply.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Guest commenting via password-protected share links.',
|
||
selfHosted: true,
|
||
sources: ['https://github.com/Techiebutler/freeframe'],
|
||
},
|
||
flask: {
|
||
id: 'flask',
|
||
name: 'Flask',
|
||
tagline: 'Voice-first video feedback that structures spoken notes automatically.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Reviewers who prefer talking through feedback instead of typing',
|
||
'Production teams of 5–100 people',
|
||
'Teams exploring AI-assisted feedback workflows',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Records spoken feedback and turns it into timestamped action items',
|
||
'Drawing, references, version compare, and Premiere export',
|
||
'MCP integration for agent-assisted workflows',
|
||
'Free tier with full features (1 asset at a time)',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'No public self-host option',
|
||
'Pro is $15/user/month billed yearly',
|
||
'Free tier limited to one active asset',
|
||
'Focused on feedback capture more than formal approval chains',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free (1 asset) · Pro $15/user/mo (yearly) · Enterprise custom',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Pro includes $0 per guest and unlimited uploads.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: '$0 per guest on Pro; free tier for trying without a card.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: ['https://flask.do/pricing', 'https://flask.do/'],
|
||
},
|
||
aligno: {
|
||
id: 'aligno',
|
||
name: 'Aligno',
|
||
tagline: 'Flat-rate multi-asset approval for designers and agencies.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Designers and agencies reviewing video alongside images and PDFs',
|
||
'Solo creators with many clients and no per-reviewer fees',
|
||
'Teams wanting explicit approve/request-changes workflow',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Flat per-creator pricing with unlimited free clients',
|
||
'Multi-asset review in one workspace',
|
||
'Explicit approval states on every version',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Less depth for full-time post-production houses',
|
||
'No self-hosting option',
|
||
'Video tooling is narrower than dedicated review platforms',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free · Pro $18/mo · Studio custom',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Clients never count toward seat limits.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Clients review via share links without accounts.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: ['https://aligno.io/pricing', 'https://aligno.io/frame-io-alternative'],
|
||
},
|
||
'videoreview-pro': {
|
||
id: 'videoreview-pro',
|
||
name: 'VideoReview.pro',
|
||
tagline: 'Minimal timestamped video feedback with a generous free tier.',
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Creators needing basic timestamped comments on a budget',
|
||
'Very small projects with limited storage needs',
|
||
'Teams testing video review for the first time',
|
||
],
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Free forever with all features included',
|
||
'Simple upload, share, and comment workflow',
|
||
'Password-protected share links',
|
||
],
|
||
limitations: [
|
||
'Only 30 minutes free storage; Pro caps at 10 hours/year',
|
||
'No formal approval workflow or version compare',
|
||
'No self-hosting or open-source option',
|
||
],
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Free (30 min) · Pro $99/year (10 hours)',
|
||
pricingNotes: ['Storage is the only plan differentiator.'],
|
||
reviewerAccess: 'Share links for client review.',
|
||
selfHosted: false,
|
||
sources: ['https://videoreview.pro/'],
|
||
},
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
export const openFrameProfile = {
|
||
name: 'OpenFrame',
|
||
tagline: 'Fair-source video review and approval with hosted and self-hosted options.',
|
||
pricingSummary: 'Self-hosted free · Hosted $10/mo after a 7-day no-card trial',
|
||
trial: '7-day free trial on hosted plan',
|
||
strengths: [
|
||
'Timestamped text, voice, image, and drawn annotations',
|
||
'Version compare with side-by-side review',
|
||
'Approval requests with per-reviewer decisions',
|
||
'Guest share links with optional password and expiry',
|
||
'PDF/CSV comment exports',
|
||
'Unlimited YouTube imports on hosted plan',
|
||
'Self-host with Docker or use hosted cloud',
|
||
],
|
||
bestFor: [
|
||
'Freelancers and small teams shipping client cuts',
|
||
'Studios that want fair-source licensing and optional self-hosting',
|
||
'Teams tired of vague email and WhatsApp feedback',
|
||
],
|
||
};
|